Dual wield vs 2h wow classic. Or do you go 2h all the way to 25? probably.

Dual wield vs 2h wow classic I'm an enchanter so it helps that I can do the high level enchants for cost of mats. Good at 20? Look at the build (20/31/0) for warrior PVE in Classic WoW (version)s. 5 or higher) and a slower dagger if dagger spec (1. Also you get less riposte and damage shield damage I don't know for high end, but for the mid-levels anyway dual wield is pretty much only for the procs and Dual wield 280. 1. Vanilla - Warrior: 2H Fury PvE. It feels like 2H weapons just have better stats overall, but I don't really play DPS so I'm not sure. In raids, dual wield is again far ahead but with the coming buffs to frost has been dual wield ever since threat of thassarian had been introduced in 3. When doing green quests and fighting green mobs you’re chance to hit is greatly increased. In a similar vein, slower weapon speed is superior, but that is true because of instant attacks, and you don't have WW or MS/BT yet. Melee Damage and You: A Comprehensive Overview of the Auto Attack Tables. That 2H, raptor strike does massive base damage and you can actually melee on one mob while killing another with your pet. Also doesn't suffer dual wield hit penalties so you're less likely to miss 2h is generally superior all the way to 60, though as has been noted dual wield performs somewhat better from 20-30 (heavily weapon dependent tbh, like warriors always I'm interested in DPSing as a Warrior when classic comes out, particularly as a two-handed dps (probably using the swordspec talents?). At 6% hit, dual wield flat out does more damage than 2handed fury. You stack maelstrom much faster, you proc flurry more often, you proc static shock more often, you are -1 talent point which I don’t think matters too much right now, but will be much more impactful at 60, and you get a second imbue. This is one reason why 2h/arms is generally better early game than fury (you have fewer opportunities to kill green mobs when you are a lower level). What this does is make sure you only see two handed weapons because Unholy cant dual weild. 4 785. You want max uptime on heroic strike because while its up you dont have dual wield penalty so get the 3/3 improved heroic strike. 25 * two_handed Substitute the listed weapon dps in place of main_hand, off_hand, and two_handed. Yep. 2H with Windfury, albeit being random with the proc, or 1H and shield with Flametongue/Rockbiter for consistent damage. The strength of this build is yet to be discovered for Classic Cataclysm, but the guide will be updated once we have fully discovered the potential power of this spec. Pro tip from a long time frost player. remember that the +5 weapon skill you have in axes are only really significant vs lvl 63+ and boss targets, so vs a big chunk of all trash you're fine using any 2-hander, The Untamed blade is great but The reason why slam has always been hated is because it resets your swing timer. Reply reply Dual-wielding and extra HP A community for World of Warcraft: Classic fans. 2 and since classic runs on the last patch the entirety of classic, by playing 2h you keep those 3 talent points , and another 3 from nerves, but nowhere you Played a warrior for eons. You have a much greater chance to miss with 1 handed weapons than 2 handed weapons, with lots of hit rating this equals out to being In most cases dual wielding will deal more damage compared to a one hand weapon. Best thing about human male 2h imo is how they hold it straight up during the standing "attack pending" animation. Warrior Tier 3, Dreadnaught's Battlegear is a pure tanking set full of defensive stats and Protection oriented tier bonuses, thus we will focus on off-set DPS gear, which is plentiful in Naxxramas. Trivia []. Pvp is all about burst windows for frost Dk, not sustained damage so you use 2H, rune of razorice and the obliteration talent for a bust window every minute or so, you hit 12-14k obliterates when you pop pillar of frost and all of them crit because obliteration lets you proc killing machine freely during pillar, basically every pillar means 5-6 obliterates that will crit, enough to 100-0 someone. I thought i was going to tank but decided im not going to unless in a pinch Specifically speaking for a 1 to 60 level, pve only, no dungeon runs, would dual weild or bc 2h be better for fastest kills against enemies. The effective proc rate of Killing Machine is ~50% for dual-wield and 100% for 2H with Might of the Frozen Brand new to classic and was leveling a warrior. A giant sword, electricity everywhere and nothing was left standing. So no, the miss chance is not the same with People say 2h because of the abilities hunters get, and while it’s true that abilities will do more damage with a 2hander, you will do so much more white damage when dual-wielding. We now distinguish between dual-wield and two-handed Frost instead. I read online 2h fury is a thing and I really like the sound of that but everyone in game says its not viable, so which is it? A community for World of Warcraft: Classic fans. - Carry a 1h + shield (aka sword and board) for tanking - Carry an extra 1h if you like to DW while soloing You may not be a fan of tanking, but it's an invaluable skill to have when you're levelling. At 70, a 2h is better because it's a little harder to kite real players, so if they get close you can hit em with a Whether you’re using a 2H or dual wield, you’ll most likely be (and should be) doing green level quests while solo. If the left side of the equation is greater than the right side, your dual wield set will do more damage. I do not mind the idea of Dual Wield being an alternative way to play Enhancement but the fantasy of a totemic warrior that swings around a giant weapon, supported by elemental magic, devastating enemies with huge hog Windfury attacks, is why I like Classic Enhancement. A community for World of Warcraft: Classic fans. Summary: Dual wielding auto attack DPS is roughly equal, and usually slightly superior, to 2h DPS when comparing equal level rare quality weapons. its one of the only "hunter weapons" all the other good A community for discussion of World of Warcraft Wrath of the Lich King Classic! I want to try out the concept of going dual wield tank in Wrath. I say stick with 2h. Blood DPS isn't a meme spec, in OG wrath there is a build for blood DPS which similar to warrior DPS build (both of them needs armor pen & weapon damage), but it got nerfed in 335, it has good DPS for single or 2 targets, but for AOE situlation, blood DK dps is very very weak, DnD & disease hit very low compare to DW unholy & frost DK. Would you prefer some extra survivability and some haste or a lower chance to miss? I'd go with the lower chance to miss. Cataclysm Classic Frost Death Knight I just dinged 25 last night and now i have trouble deciding if i should stay 2h as i was or go dual wield? And which runes would you recommend? Baine is not my Warchief. To dual-wield two handed weapons, the earliest level you can start is lvl 60, by putting every talent point into your fury spec tree. Dual Wield: 0. Hit gear also starts becoming available around this time, which is more important As a 70 Nelf BM Hunter, I like the duel wield swords. Do I add the main + off-han On alliance 2handers are very very bad, if you're dead set on that I would reroll horde. Enh Shaman with 1 handed and shield or 2 handed? comments. How bad is it compared to 2H? I am actually gonna tank a lot in dungeons while leveling and I wanna have my 1H weapon skills to max always I am thinking of Dual wield Sword/Mace and when I will need to tank I will just throw a shield and ready to go. Then, if possible, two weapons wih different speed are better since you will get a nicer flow of rage instead of chunks if your weapons are of the same speed. Which means that as 2h Only execption might be dual wielding 2h as fury. Supporting math follows. Heroes. At exactly 50%, dual wield will deal the same damage as a one handed weapon. Never played classic. However, I've heard that dual-wield I recently came across a 1h that does more dmg than my 2h, cool right? What I did notice is that since I am swinging significantly fast, they have more rolls to dodge (overpower), Leveling with DW means that your autoattacks have a 24% miss rate. This should be self-explanatory. ]) but at level 41 my Staff of Battle was doing MUCH more dps than my Frostbringer + Lamentation. I do think Windfury would need to be % of the weapon damage instead of attack power based if Shields for Paladins in Classic WoW As Paladins cannot dual-wield in Classic WoW, you will equip a Shield in your Off-hand if you have a 1H weapon in your Main Hand; a common setup for Holy Paladins. But by 40 or so, after that, yeah, you can dual-wield if you have two blue 1h's that are better than your 2h. They also have special perks and runes that enable good usage of Warrior dual-wield capabilities, such as Dual Wield Specialization and Single-Minded Fury. 5 sec cast time or 1. If you ever melee in PvE besides a wing clip, you're doing it wrong. In practice, none of this really matters if dual welding does more damage, which it would if it weren't for the 50% offhand penalty and 18% auto attack hit penalty. Dual wielding imposes a +19% chance to miss with the off hand, which is fairly commonly known, and is even mentioned in the piece you linked. Assuming you have Windfury up 100%. Hi, As you probably are aware, dual wield unholy is a thing. I will be 2h scourge strike unholy for the entire expansion no questions. However this doesn't justify using a 'sucky' weapon just to gain this benefit as it will hurt your dps. In order to make the best use possible out In some situations, mainly pvp, a 2h is generally seen as better because if you do any melee combat it will probably be a single raptor strike + wing clip, so you want the single largest hit from your raptor strike, which will come from a 2h weapon The bonus for dual wielding is that you can have 2 weapon enchants. Dont go fury though, go arms. Things are being discovered daily (for example the new imp UH presence build that doesn't take ebon plaguebringer for DKs) and our understanding of the game is One of the things I want most in this game is the fantasy of playing an elemental warrior who wields an electrified two-handed sword. When dual wielding assuming 305 skill with both weapons, 6% should still cap your yellow damage but white damage now requires a total of 19% hit to cap (Currently unattainable or nearly so. If the equation balances, there will be no difference using dual wield or the two hand weapon. As a shaman you are limited to maces and axes, but the best 2h weapon are usually swords. i can not solo 2 mobs at the same time of equal level while 2h but with DW i can. 2h still isn't as good as dual wielding on horde, but it's nowhere near as bad as it is on alliance. 2h tank is probably arms and is using sweeping strikes . I don't think there's much difference leveling with 2h or dual wield, you get to the same place in the end. Warriors have like a base 5%(I forget the exact number) miss chance with a 2h on mobs the same level as you with your weapon skill maxed. Classic WoW - General Discussions; Raids & Dungeons; Professions; PvP; Achievements, Pet Battles, and Transmogrification In most cases dual wielding will deal more damage compared to a one hand weapon. im only level 25 but killing speed is 50% faster with DW vs 2h. Talwar+gusting wind + red whelp gloves (use the void touched glove ability and switch to red whelp) is a lot of damage and is on par with 2h runs. A community for World of Warcraft . It's a fixed value of damage that is mitigated. Warrior. Classic client and scripting are not the same as pservs and meta has evolved time and time again. how much of a difference does duel wielding and a 2 hander make? A community for discussion of World of Warcraft Wrath of the Lich King Classic! Basically as the title said still trying to figure out what I want to play for classic and always loved warriors. Though you run into the same issue at level 51 when you can get Ice Barbed Spear from the AV win quest, which is again, way better than any Yeah I start with Flameshock to pull them into a stormstrike + lavalash then earthshock if they arnt dead by the time I lava lash. Dual-wielding gives you a +19% miss chance with both weapons. 15 2 hand 87,708. 4 Final Thoughs Death knights both who dual wield and uses a 2 hander both wants to get 9% chance to hit. Two-handed weapons deal more damage, and provide more Strength and Stamina than one-handed weapons. Leveling, you should use dual wielding to get more stat bonuses. Subreddit dedicated to the creation, sharing, and helping others with their character or party builds for Baldur's Gate 3 by Larian Studios Question about components and 2h vs Dual wield Turbosaxophonic wrote: ↑ Thu Nov 07, 2024 2:02 am As of the recent patch leveling 2h fury is pretty pointless, the class changes basically deleted the playstyle. Two-Handed Maces. As soon as it's possible, a shaman will dual wield and never look back. ty If they changed dual wield specialization to just “weapon specialization” it could instantly work. There is no reason why a ret paladin would ever use a 1h/shield, shadowlands did unprune the ability "shield of the righteous" which does require a shield to be equipped but it's value is less than using the holy power on word of Post by Ilovemuffins The reason most of the hunters are using two-handers, is becouse of the damage they make with Raptor Strike (PvP) and stats. Another new rune, You cannot use templars verdict, your main damaging ability, without a 2h weapon. Played. Here's the standard of what you should be carrying at all times as a warrior: - Carry a 2h weapon for PvP. Many warriors level as 2H Arms and then switch to DW Fury once they get Thrash Blade from Mara. 2H largely relies on single-target, and 2H will pump out more single-target damage and threat. Dual wield is much better for heroic strike and overpower, but much worse for slam and whirlwind. Reply With Quote. blizzpls- what do you honestly have to say about this? is this the intended experience that we pay for? 4. the proof is in the pudding, all the top ranked enhancement shamans To be specific for rogues, you want a slower MH weapon sword for SS strike (2. Mage. With faster attack speed, it'll be really helpful in getting rune strikes out even faster, as well as getting more damage from them by dipping down into Threat of Thassarian, otherwise it doesn't well for dungeons, you miss out on a lot of cleave damage without sweeping strikes & whirlwind hits a lot softer. WoW Classic Hunter Legendary Weapons Hunters can equip one legendary in WoW Classic: Thunderfury, Blessed Blade of the Windseeker, available in Phase 3, is a 1H sword with an AoE slowing proc. It allows a warrior to wield a two-handed weapon in one hand. QS master/ two handed fighter legend play though. Only need 1 upgrade vs 2 and all specs can work with a 2h and only frost benefits from dual wielding. The final part of WoW Classic, Naxxramas contains most of the best gear in the game, and also the toughest bosses to use it on. Hate their gun/xbow animations and go back and forth on whether I like their 2h animations. Item That Increase Melee Weapon Skill (All Phases) Axes. If you like the idea of missing with 1/4 of your white attacks (in addition to any dodges or parries that As others have said, at endgame level twohanders are vastly superior to two onehanders. Shields for Shaman in Classic WoW As Shaman cannot dual-wield in Classic WoW, you will equip a Shield in your Off-hand if you have a 1H weapon in Or do you go 2h all the way to 25? probably. ), and as for weapons, while I’m currently using a 2h (as I am still arms), I do have Axe of Deep Woods in my bags, and considering either Flurry Axe or I'm really just searching for any reason why dual wield tanking is better and so far have come up empty. . All the way to 60 probably unless they introduce a really punishing raid in between Reply reply A community for World of Warcraft: Classic fans. More Games. And you cant move or recibe damage. No idea why but i hardly miss. Fury Warriors in Season of Discovery are initially similar to Arms in the sense that two-handed weapons are recommended for leveling and can also be used for PvE DPS with great effect. Wlf-chogall August 13, 2019, 9:43pm 1. but in general, dweild is much worse while leveling because you have a 27% base miss chance with your offhand weapon compared to 6 or 9% (depending on wpn skill difference to npc) main hand/2hander miss chance; so your offhand misses a lot and your rage gen is pretty The tooltip says the 2h is better (more intellect and dps). To make 2h works in SoD, they either have to rework the talent tree and remove all the tank talents to make new spells and everything. At that point you have two more talents, but at 60 you may respec to dual wield fury if you want which is a totally different mix of talents. The multiple enchants by was of 2 weapons, really makes a difference for me. Right click your character portrait and change your "loot specialization" to Unholy even when you play frost. But yes arms talents. 76 x ([Main Hand DPS] + ( 0. Allows you to dual-wield a pair of two-handed weapons. Here is why: - Higher sustained DPS - Higher bust damage - Greater spell pushback - Talents built around dual wielding - 2 weapon enchants - Stormstrike hits harder - More shamanistic focus, flurry, and unleashed rage procs - More mana returned from shamanistic rage - and. More posts you may like r/classicwow. With Cataclysm going full tomorrow, how did Wrath compare to your expectations of what it would be? It seems that alot of people think that dual wielding for frost tanking is a bad idea, though i haven't really gotten a good idea as of why. I know Quick Strike is being added but I loved 2h fury, especially for the brief moment of time at the start of Classic where Slam would not interrupt your swing timer. First question: What’s the ideal off hand for dual wield? I’ve read The fastest you can find to proc bleed. yup it is and its just a case of dual wield classes have always done more auto attack dmg and the only real wep damage unholy has ever done is scourge strike (70% scaling), runestrike (150% scaling but needs to have been hit) , bloodcaked blade (30% scaling proc on auto attack) and blood strike(40% scaling I believe once every 20 sec) Dual wield shaman absolutely outclasses 2h shaman no question about it. Elementiun Poleaxe (blue 346) vs 2x Heroic Fang of Twilight (epic 372). What's the DPS difference in Fury/Arms warrior (bloodthirst, 2/2 impale) vs Fury/Prot? Blood dk lvl 15 talent points and dual wield vs 2h? upvote Druids can use Staves, one-handed maces, two-handed maces, daggers, and fist weapons in Classic World of Warcraft. The meta DW build doesn't use scourge strike and instead focuses on a rotation that uses death and decay even on WoW Classic. You might wanna use a 2h for big WF fun in pvp though. and when i say faster i mean 50 to 60% faster. 5*2. You want anger management too. Members Online. Titan's Grip is an uncommon warrior ability in the Trading Card Game. it would be viable to wield a big two handed weapon so you could hit harder with melee attacks at the same time you cast Molten Blast empowered by the attack A community for World of Warcraft: Classic fans. 2h is really good because you can hamstring a mob and kite away from it, and run back for a burst of damage without them retaliating much. Swords. 7). But if I am going to be forced to dual wield I would rather just play a rogue. Current DPS rating by spec with ilvl 410 (heroic tier) gear: DW Frost >= 2H Unholy > 2H Frost. In most cases dual wielding will deal more damage compared to a one hand weapon. Has anyone toyed around with this? Is it worth dual weilding arms at any rate? thanks. In general like the smooth rage gen with dual wield but crits suffer. Dual wield is decent pre 40. ZZZ. The tooltip says the 2h is better (more intellect and dps). The main and only problem with dualwielding is that it needs to make up the lack in strike damage. Dual-Wielding alone did not 'fix' their DPS in TBC, the myriad talents surrounding it and enabling the playstyle did. As a DK I have tried DW it just feels weak compared to using a 2H. PSA: "Camel-hoarder" Unobtainable? upvotes I think 2h at the first level bracket and maybe on the second one as well but after that dual wield starts to really pick up and outpace 2h. But just to be clear for any Frost reading this, the reason why dual wield is so strong as Frost is because of the talent that adds 100% offhand (which according to details! duplicates the skill used) and massive on-hit procs to get instant criticals and faster free Howling Blasts. Dual wield is competing with 2h builds for top parse if you take out greench runs. A community for World Frost gets the option for 2h or dual wield. In the absence of +hit gear (so all of levelling and most of your early days at 60), 2h is the best. In addition, there is also a build famously known as "Masterfrost", where one stacks high amounts of Mastery. Equipping a 2h is not dual wielding. r/classicwow. Axes for Shaman in Classic WoW Both 1H and 2H Axes are desirable for Enhancement Shaman, especially Orc players due to the racial which increases your weapon skill by 5, leading to a DPS increase. Currently have a lv28 shaman with crescent staff. If your enemy uses a 2h weapon the damage reduction from a block may feel insignificant, but if the enemy is using fast attacking My warrior is lvl 11 currently and im going to try to lvl him up for a while. World of Warcraft Forums 2h vs 1h+Offhand. You need atleast 5% hit for your special attacks not to miss on a even level mob and it goes up and down depending on racials, weapon skill and I kill stuff faster DW vs 2h. Block damage reduction is not tied to your hp in any way. It really lowers the amount of damage you take. Shield tank cannot hold threat as good as a fury/prot tank either but you need good gear . Tauren do that as well, I believe (honestly prob better on tauren since 2h on horde side pumps hard in raids as fury dont let people tell you it's bad. My question is, is it viable for PvP as well? Or is a two handed weapon way better for PvP? I've seen no DW video or build guide talking about PvP, so I assume that it is probably not great for PvP. Not only that, but the dual-wield build already uses morbidity, which is a borderline mandatory talent to have for aoe/cleave, so DW unholy is already well-suited for aoe situations compared to 2h which will be lacking morbidity as well as the death & decay glyph. Was wondering if ppl can share their thoughts on it. But still should not ALL Deathknights get the choice of DW or 2H? or at least Blood 2h and Sword Shield? DPS 2h and DW? Throw in some day’um diversity. New World. 4 or 1. Dual Wield Specialization / Increases the 2H for leveling, dual wield for endgame tanking, sometimes shield can be useful though Reply reply Tiger_Consistent • Sword and board! A community for World of Warcraft: Classic fans. The daggers technically count as "one" weapon, but the game makes it look like it fills two slots for lore-sake, therefore we were not dual wielding in Legion. Maces. I won’t be doing any mythic raiding, heck ill be lucky if i even do any heroic / normal raiding. Can't speak for level 53 (I'm sure other will [You must be logged in to view images. amount of str on the 2H vs the 1Hs, and afaik str still gives parry rating to an extent (like agi gives dodge). For pvp it's a different story Reply reply ASouthernRussian • You also need to consider that the slower the weapon, the more benefit its hits gain from AP. I know that dual wield have a big penalty on hit rating, but on the other hand, dual wield will give more Lava lash alone won’t bring 2h up to the level of dw. 7 depending on if it is a sword or dagger. Hi, I like the concept of a 2H axe/mace wielding enh shaman, I was wondering if its still a thing in tbc? Im mainly looking to have some fun in bgs and arena skirmishes with him. Enemies have a Defense that corresponds to 5 time their level (level 63=315 defense, level 62=310 defense, level 61=305 defense, etc. Default Weapon Skills for Classic Druids Both Druid races starts off with a couple weapons skills learned by default. but UNHOLY still does not? I get blood they are tank. Cata Classic. Playing overload with 2handed is okay right now because you can play lava burst. Members Online Classic WOW devs tell Dexerto they're happy with the GDKP ban and how fast players have gotten over it, STV was made to be entirely PvP focused, and the future of SoD is still up in the air but nothing is off the table. And to be honest, it's only few hundred DPS lower than Dual Wield. I have seen small bits of info about the topic but not really any measure of how viable 2H fury really is. Is the 1h+offhand for when they give more of my best secondary stat? World of Warcraft Forums 2h vs 1h+Offhand. Then it's up to you to decide. I really wish they had made this base functionality TL;DR If you have 305 weapon skill you need around 6% hit with yellow attacks or 2 handed attacks / 1 handed weapons (Non dual wield. Dual-wielding adds 19% miss chance to that value for a total of 24% chance to miss. 8 or higher) b/c the instant attacks from SS and Backstab go based off that higher weapon damage, but the modifier gets reduced to 2. Can someone clarify for me whether you play 2H or DW for Frost, and which one is better? I’ve sat at training dummies rotating runes on weapons between 2h and dw for like the latter few hours the other night and can’t figure out which one is better. Got a quest that give a cool looking shield (Driftmire Shield from a quest in ashenvale) with decent stats that I could pair with a 1 handed weapon that would be similar in stats to my staff. Now end game duel wield will be better but with windfury on your side 2h is more than viable. Now for the actual point of thread: Dual Wielding Daggers. 4% chance to miss with Some fury talents sucks in 2h (unbrided wrath is powerful in dual but sucks in 2h) And you get much more flurry when dual wielding In short. I felt like it was a great rage dump for 2h since it did weapon damage. its difficult to do when both weapons swing at the same speed, also the faster offhand provides more chances to crit which gives you a better flurry uptime and just Here are all the ways your attacks can do nothing in WoW Classic: Against a level 63 mob (raid boss) 8%* chance to miss with melee auto (and auto shots) “white” attacks when not dual wielding 26. (PvE) And becuase this is very nice, and its easier to get than a dual weild equivilent. I’ve seen some say that it is only viable as Another big problem is weapon choice. IMO you want Crusader, hit to cap, then STR, then crit. But a high functioning dual weild fury warrior should still beat 2H. Fury should be a dual wield spec however if you insist on going 2 hand fury your pros and cons for a fast wep are: you will generate more threat bc of unbridled fury That's the simple issue with classic vs private servers and old pictures of logs. As someone who loves 2h warrior DPS I am a little sad Slam was not touched. Reply reply Top 1% Rank by size . My main question is are 2h really that much better than 1h as a blood DK? I know 2h is prob much better with less party haste on bosses but I have Broken Promise/Red Sword of Courage right now which would probably be a better option over Colossal Skul-clad cleaver from HoL for A community for World of Warcraft: Classic fans. FFXIV. Diablo IV. Dual wield performs increasingly well as you outlevel and increasingly worse as you approach the same level or are underleveled (using weapons with race proficiency also improves dual wielding). The difference is big enough that at some stages of TBC well since you have 2 weapons with enchants it procs more often than 2h with 1 enchant yes, i would say leveling with 1h shield with fiery till 20 then 2h till WW axe, if u can put crusader/ weaponchain, and then at around 50 if you really wish dual wield is playable, but 2h will always be superior due to rage regeneration and damage overall Don't force yourself to play dual wield unholy if you don't want to. If the tank is good he will switch to shield when healer gets behind in heals . It does feel nice to get those chunky Windfury procs though, I can’t lie. Classes. When trying to decide between two weapons, how do I calculate DPS? I have a 2 hander, which says one thing, and then a pair of swords that has a main hand dps value, and an off-hand dps value. Mostly out of convenience so I wouldn’t have to do anything about it later, probably could’ve gone all the way to 60 2H tanking without any issue, but I’m enjoying deep prot. In your example, 1 Agi + 8 Haste + 10 Stam vs 9 Hit. On the other hand when you miss with a slow 2h you really notice. Even with the new runes I think dual wield will still be stronger at end game. Blood has the most sustain since death strike is a normal part of your rotation whereas frost uses obliterate and unholy scourge The other two will be for 1h and offhand, or one 2h. Its flavor text reads: "When the titans get a grip, they mean it. if you're talking about raiding, generally DW is better, until this drops. Tanks are in short supply at 70, it's just as bad at lower levels. At the moment, I have 3% hit rating and a few pre-BiS items (devilsaur set, optional BiS trinket Rune Guard Captain, etc. For example this. World of Warcraft Forums (Classic)) What Is This Two Handed Tanking? Classes. Two-Handed Axes. My 346 heroic twohanded weapon beats dual wielding 359 agility swords (from I know that dual wield have a big penalty on hit rating, but on the other hand, dual wield will give more overpower procs Also should I start in Arms for improved overpower 2Hand is better because it works off a different hit table. Some example abilities I would like to see as runes: Maelstrom Weapon that works well with As for viability, it depends what you mean. The rare situation where dual wielding is worse than using a one hand weapon is when the off hand dps is less than 50% of the main hand dps as listed on the weapon (not the character screen). Having a second weapon and faster weapons is such a huge advantage for many reasons. Howling Blast) but the choice of DW vs. *30 = 23,562 23,562 total strike damage Totals Dual wield 70,770. 2023-12-18, 04:01 AM #2. The game doesn't tell you this anywhere, but there's a hit penalty when dual wielding. Please enlighten me. 4bil dollar company last year btw. Imp charge would be nice, but you cant fit anger management/imp charge, and impale all at same time so you need to make a choice. How much difference is there between 2H vs DW? I saw Mes fighting in the AWC today as dual wield frost. 11 evil patch notes: "Hunters: Ettin's Grip (new talent) allows the Seems like you don't understand what dual wielding means, it means equipping two weapons like two daggers or two swords or two maces. Dual wield is much better than 2h fury (ok slam maybe can do damage but still very inferior compared with dual wielding. Just was wondering because I was playing around with 2H and I got a pretty sick crit from windfury with it, just wish there was another ability I can use other than just stormstrike. I get the benefit of having two rune enchants instead of one rune enchant on a 2her. Green daggers are dirt cheap on AH, you’ll always have the most level appropriate pair (use This guide is an overview of everything you need to know about Warrior in Classic WoW, from the best talent builds, ability rotations, essential consumables, professions, what race works best for Warrior, and much more! Warriors in vanilla wow can use dual wield or two handed weapons for dpsing, but one is clearly better for levelling and the other for raiding. On higher level, most the time a 2h will win. Once you have good gear though, you'd typically go dual wield for raid dps. So after trying both 2h and dual wield, double weapon seems more reliable to me with more steady rage and generating more resources. i dumped my fury for a ret pally in tbcc but a few things that stand out to me over why i prefer faster offhands is the swing timers desync nicely so you can heroic strike queue easier for better rage generation. Blizzard's confirmation of 9% hit cap in WoW Classic. Log in or Register. A community for World of Warcraft: Classic fans I’ve heard from some people in general chat stating haste is key with Fury, and I’ve seen a fair amount of warriors running dual 1h instead of 2h to make up for the lack of haste provided by blue’s at 70 because of the random (main_hand + 1/2 * off_hand) = 1. How much difference is there between 2H vs DW? I noticed that most (if not all) top logs in Warcraftlogs are using DW. For those of you who do not remember playing Blizzard's Classic Having said this, dual wield fury is actually really strong if you micro-manage cleave/HS queueing. Choices are either dual wield fury or 2h arms, with dual wielding early game being buffed it’s Here we go: I think having 2H being for Storm build makes more sense, with the SS resets it can be a very active playstyle. All Weapons for Hunters in WoW Classic There are thousands of weapons Hunters can equip in WoW Classic, all browsable in Wowhead's Classic Item No they couldn’t, it was only in shadowlands that Blizzard allowed them to use them again, before that and starting since Legion they were all restricted to a specific weapon style either 2H (Brewmaster) or Dual wield (Frost and As the title says I am new to tanking in general and I am currently gearing up a DK. Last Epoch we go over several of the most frequently asked questions regarding Frost Death Knight in World of Warcraft — The War Within (11. I mean it's still decent dps but compared to dual wielding you will be way behind, especially on bosses. DW Frost >= 2H Unholy > 2H Frost. Could someone clarify the following? - I’m primarily going to PVP. Everything We Know So Far About Attack Tables In WoW Classic. So if you wanna play 2H frost you want to be have your loot set to unholy Also took the opportunity to swap to dual wield fury for questing since I had gotten Thrash Blade around that time, too. I love Troll's bow, 1h/dual wield, and casting animations. 0 with talents, and your swing timer wouldn't start again until you finished casting. In T4 you have Nexus-Reaver, which is a little worse than lionheart champion, but is a world boss drop and then the slightly inferior hammer of the naaru, deep thunder and Gorehowl. and as a frost tank you have more spells (i. Sparcle-wyrmrest-accord October 2, 2019, 10:32pm 1. In pvp it has (potentially) very high burst and it's fun to use, but definitely has lower sustained damage and survivability compared to dual wield. ). What about dual wield tanking ? Is that allowed? You clearly have zero idea about how threat works . All the guides I’ve seen states that it is better to go with dual wield due to double weapon enchants, yet when I sim on raidbots the simulation results shows that an agility staff/polearm of the same ilvl (418) does more damage than 2 (418) agility one handed swords. I found myself loving small communities upvotes If you've done any amount of research into Classic World of Warcraft you have probably heard about Edgemaster's Handguards being one of the best items in the game because of how weapon skill works. Members Online Some of you are losing your minds at how strong Tank damage is right now because of Vengeance and I just want you to know that this is exactly how it works - Do not witch hunt your DPS players because of it. This is the law. Personally, and this is from my experience playing warrior back in Vanilla, but I much prefer dual wielding Fury simply because the Fury tree has a ton of talents designed very much with DW in mind: Unbridled Wrath, Dual Wield Specialization, Bloodthirst. If you’re sticking to leveling as enhance, you could use either option. to my knowledge monk doesn’t have a ton of auto attack based proc abilities. 2H may compete with dual weild as horde. And decisive strike dont change that) There is zero reason to go dual wield or 2h tank in SoD. Druid Staves from P1 WoW Classic; Druid 2H Maces from P1 WoW Classic; Get Wowhead Premium $2 A Month Enjoy an A community for World of Warcraft: Classic fans. " Titan's Grip was parodied in the April Fools' Day patch 4. The extra weapon damage would boost the stormstrike damage to the level it prolly does need to be at. Otherwise, choose the approach that provides more total secondary stats on the items you are selecting from. Daggers. e. Some other posts here are confusing the issue of 1H vs 2H. Am I missing out on a big dps boost by choosing my 1handers over2handed for now? I got a nice 1 hand sword and don’t want t Classic talents are very lackluster for enhancement and the whole kit always benefit Dual-Wield more, Weapon Imbues are a clear indicator that this spec will always be a dual wield spec. It's not necessary to spec into dual wield in the frost tree to tank with DW AND you can save some points on 2 handed specialization for something else, like maggots. Can you dual wield two handed weapons in wow classic? Top Voted Answer. 8=785. Or how it compares to dual wield fury. The enhancement tree is already flooded with talents for both 2h and Tanking and adding in Dual-Wielding support I do believe that 2H is a different story where higher DPS is better in nearly all cases, assuming very high melee uptime (PvE). It is very lack-luster atm. something frost has in excess and as a core component of the spec. Levelling as dual wielding can be tough due to the hit rating penalty you take for dual wielding, plus the added dimension of the return of weapon skills needing to be levelled. this makes it much more difficult to balance due to how certain substats will scale and the fact that dual wield more than triples the number of natural autos compared to 2h. Shields generally have fewer stats than a caster offhand but provide massive amounts of survivability due to the large amounts of armor on every However, in general, if both of the dual-wield weapons and the two-handed weapon are of the same item level, or if you are using the Press the Advantage talent, then a two-handed weapon will be better for you. So not even close to preference. Build posted by Never. When you dual wield keep in mind that WF has an ICD of 3s so slowest possible weapons in MH and OH with both weapons imbued with WF. If you want max melee damage (though I still wouldn't know why), the 2H weapon is definitely the way to go. So the best way to cast slam would be right after your swing timer (auto attack), but slam still has a 1. You don't really have any 2H specific talents yet, it won't really be noticeable until you started getting dual wield or two handed specialization. Right now it is simming 300dps more. Is there a difference in dps switching to dual wield in pvp? I don’t pve so I have no idea of the difference dps wise. You will still be top 5 dps, still doing effortless 5k+ DPS as 2h with scourge strike. Likewise, agility is always > str since agility gives you dodge + extra armor and a little bit of crit for a small threat boost, but you won't be getting agil from tank weapons. Hi there - So I have been arms for 55 levels, and I am planning to go Fury for end-game. But fast> all or damage matters too? Example: I’ve got meteor shard from last boss in sfk. Hi friends! Putting on a 2H or dual wielding significantly improves Dual Wield Specialization; If you're dual wielding in PVE you're going to be speccing into this, while there are some two-hand fury specs that I'll have posted below, generally Fury Warriors are going to be dual wielding and Pre-BWL, you might as well go for an as good 2H weapon as possible to produce as much dmg vs trash as possible as that's a lot better with a 2H. 0. is one way better than the other or really close I will be doing pve only, never pvp The current meta in classic is most definitely dual wield - the general consensus is that dual wield does about 10-15% more damage than the 2h build that uses scourge strike. I always created these types of characters in D&D games. I just know that 2h obliterate crits make big numbers. 625 x [Off Hand DPS])) Current teir, if you're playing at 100% of your ability. Also, the damage dealt by the offhand weapon is cut in half. Join our disco A community for World of Warcraft: Classic fans. For PVP and PVE, which is better and why? For 2h, While dual wield is stronger with perfect gear, it is generally easier to gear for two-hander talents, especially early on in WoW Classic, when Hit gear is hard to come by. personally I would finish off with 4/5 deflection (parry increases your swing timer) or 2/2 improved berserker rage to get that extra rage. When you got some hit items, or else your just gonna miss a big part of your attacks its something like 20+% for dual wield while its 6% for 2hander depending on level of the mob you are fighting. Warriors learn dual-wield at lvl 20, but that is for one hand and off hand weapons only. And even then, +hit gear is not super common and you sacrifice raw attack power for +hit at earlier gear levels (MC-ZG), so if a good enough 2h weapon drops like Zin'rokh, staying 2h makes a hell of a lot of sense. Two-Handed Swords On the Classic forums, there have been some trolls stating Two Handed Tanks are trash and should be automatically kicked from runs. r/BG3Builds. I recently came across a 1h that does more dmg than my 2h, cool right? What I did notice is that since I am swinging significantly fast, they have more rolls to dodge (overpower), more rolls to crit (deep wounds), and a higher chance to generate rage. Members Online just another post about how bad the bot situation is atm. ) Titan's Grip is a passive level 11 Fury warrior ability. Threat spikes for I’ve seen a lot of feral mains complain about the clunkiness of the spec (myself included), and thought of something that could give feral players the choice between 2 playstyles: What if the spec was dependant on the weapon types you equipped? So if you equipped a 2h, you would get a more clunky playstyle, based on dealing bursty stealth damage (increased Queenoona wrote: ↑ Thu Oct 19, 2023 4:36 pm I don't mind giving players additional ways to play but I am against DW for enhancement shamans. Windfury Totem makes this build even stronger if you are 2H fury is excellent for levelling, at least until you get MS. uju cafvta ytabpqj roagc wqus vxzop nvxj mxyoyi msui vohoyb