Hantek vs rigol reddit ds105. I have a cheap Hantek, Im not impressed.

Hantek vs rigol reddit ds105 If you activate all the options on the Rigol, you will get a lot more capable scope and probably for less money than the Hantek to boot. (some lessons I learned googling this rubbish) Sep 9, 2023 · Hi, i want to buy a new scope, the one i have right now is a 2ch Hantek, i was looking the models MSO5074 and the new DHO914s, both from rigol, and for me it seems that the only advantages in the DHO914s are the 12bit resolution and the price of course, i need some advices to make my choice, is the 12bit so much better that is worth to give up in other features? Oct 1, 2024 · Two popular four channel oscilloscopes, the Rigol DS1054Z and the Siglent SDS1104X-E, are often compared because of their features and affordability. Hacked Rigol 1054Z (100MHz), Hantek 2C10 or 5102 the usual suspects, they will all work great. You decide what’s more important for you, since they all are a few bucks above your current budget. Dec 29, 2020 · They sell all of these brands but not all the same models, so for the Rigol is selected the 200mhz (DS1202Z-E) for their comparison. Power the Rigol with a small 30 watt inverter connected to a 12 volt battery. Comparison of Hantek DSO5102P and Rigol DS1054Z. If you read Rigol's papers, 0. Apr 1, 2018 · The Rigol is a 4ch scope, that Hantek is only 2ch. The side-by-side comparison of the oscilloscopes’ specifications. Hantek also has some standalone units as well that are priced similarly. The difference between 'no scope' and a Hantek is HUGE. Never want this catastroph repeating. The comparison table makes it easier to choose between the Hantek DSO5102P and Rigol DS1102E oscilloscopes. Mar 7, 2024 · Owon / Hantek = Hyundia / Kia Rigol / Siglent = Honda / Toyota In fairness, I've got a portable battery operated single channel 20MHz Owon HDS1021M scope that I bought around 2008 and it still works well for what it is. The AT875r isn’t a terrible mic, and definitely punches above its price point, but if you want to get serious and invest in a better workhorse of a shotgun, take a look at the Sennheiser MKH8060. Definitely seems to be worth it compared to the cheaper Hantek USB-interface based scopes. One thing that I would like to be able to do in addition to the usual functionality is to make precise measurements over a long time. The Hantek 6022 has a number of issues and only runs at 24 MS/s well enough to be usable. Start problem with a Rigol DS 1054Z oscilloscope I just brought one, plugged it in and it only shows the boot screen and beeps while most of the button light is on. Comparison of Rigol DS1054Z and Hantek DSO5102P. Best case: OpenSource/LabView/Matlab Worst Case: just a tool from 2011 from the manufactor with the design of a Windows 98 application Nov 8, 2019 · They offer me a Rigol DS1102e for about € 175 ($ 200) and I also have the opportunity to buy the Hantek dso5102p for about € 200 ($ 225). Aug 16, 2017 · <snipped> I sell also Owon and have previously sold Hantek and Rigol. Sep 11, 2019 · And if we enter into technical characteristics: Siglent is better than Rigol in: Siglent has 2 Adc of 1Gs, being able to work the 4 channels at 500Ms Rigol has 1 Adc of 1Gs, being able to work the 4 channels at 250Ms Siglent Wfm = 100,000, up to 400,000 in segmented memory. Get the Tek! The official Python community for Reddit! Stay up to date with the latest news Been trying to settle up and buy a digital oscilloscope for some time. Siglent is another one to check out, maybe they'll have something else you value. Mar 5, 2024 · Hello, There seems to be 2 topics related to the Rigol DHO800/DHO900 series scopes. My journey in test electronics so far has involved using an Arduino Mega and a Saleae USB, focusing on learning electronics, repairing home equipment, and a bit of device hacking. The game features a massive, gorgeous map, an elaborate elemental combat system, engaging storyline & characters, co-op game mode, soothing soundtrack, and much more for you to explore! Thanks for the information here but I have to ask do you own a Rigol dho804? I am reading in the comments on a couple youtube videos that there has been a firmware update and they are unable to unlock the extra bandwith, which was a big draw to the 804 vs the 814. I´d like to buy Hantek DSO5072P Digital Storage Oscilloscope (70MHz 2Channels 1GSa/s 7inch TFT LCD) from Banggood. ) and the Rigol can be hacked for 100MHz as well. Oct 17, 2012 · With 80% fewer pixels than the Hantek and 85% fewer pixels than the Owon, though, I'm not sure the Rigol has enough other redeeming characteristics to push it above 3rd place. This sub is for tool enthusiasts worldwide to talk about tools, professionals and hobbyists alike. Rigol has more features/$ than Hantek. My HP 54615B has only two channels but is fully populated with various options (FFT + serial) and was last Hantek DSO2D15 Digital Storage Oscilloscope 150MHz 241$ OWON 100Mhz Digital Oscilloscope SDS1104 299$ Siglent Technologies SDS1202X-E 200 mhz Digital 380$ Oct 19, 2016 · Hantek DSO5202P vs. ). I went to buy a Rigol scope, but Rigol ended up not shipping it to my supplier in their order and it was back ordered for a while. While the first one is a few bucks more affordable, consumes less space, and is lighter, the design of the buttons could be better. The other seems about unboxing, teardown, and hacki The rigol interface is slow (especially waiting for it to boot) clunky and has a fairly low Res screen. We welcome posts about "new tool day", estate sale/car boot sale finds, "what is this" tool, advice about the best tool for a job, homemade tools, 3D printed accessories, toolbox/shop tours. If there is 0. Same screen size for all models. Both 2ch and 4ch variants offer a fast processing backend, decode from sample memory and FFT up to 1M. Right now I want to decide between the Rigol DS1054Z, the Rigol DS 1074Z Plus, and the Rigol 1074Z-S Plus and I have a few questions for you great people. Keysight also has a pretty new line of budget scopes (1000X series) but they start at $1500 if you want to match the channel count and bandwidth of the Rigol This may even cover some of your desk based scenarios. The Rigol is cheaper, but it is much older. Is in the same price category as the Siglent and HMO. The Rigol DS1054Z is a very popular choice for those in the market for an oscilloscope due to its low price and comprehensive feature set. Siglent and Owon are playing catch-up. In your normal use of a scope what do you do with it, and what levels/precision do you work with? Oct 8, 2021 · I’m on a super tight budget so I’m going to go with Hantek. Want to get some opinions and from those who have either. So maybe sell the keysight and get a the rigol oscilloscope and a rigol spectrum analyzer or a power supply. Now I’m not sure if this is the case with other scopes, this is the first DSO I have, but when you set the memory to 8M, you can’t get full sampling speed. Entry level scopes by brands like Rigol and Hantek can be great, but it depends on what you do in your field if they'd be enough. I would say no that isn't true, if you can software licence a piece of hardware to perform a task that is already built into the device, for instance I used to work on a teradyne lh in circuit tester machine, base software wouldn't let me use like 60% of the machines potential, all the hardware was there, just couldn't access it without a software licence. None of them gets any serious use because my projects have so far been done on my old but trusted HP 54615B 500MHz oscilloscope. I'm looking for something that will mainly be used in diagnosing and repairing old/retro computers, game consoles, and related hardware. Rigol quality is typically far better than Hantek. g. Sterowniki do Hantek6022BE na prośbę. A Rigol DS1102Z-E is $249, while a comparable USB scope is over $700. The GDS 2104E has a lower sample frequency (1GHz / 2GHz), more memory (10Mpt/2Mpt) and a higher frame update rate (120k/s / 80k/s) than the older GDS 2104A, which has a logic analyser and generator option. 1054Z - $350, 4 analog channels, no digital channels, 50 MHz Bandwidth Those are another league in quality and usability (especially waveform update rates, capture consistency and user interface fluidity), but you get less features for more money I would always prefer a Keysight, Tektronix or Rohde&Schwarz over the Hantek/Siglents/Rigol trio. Hi! I'm looking for a good entry-level signal generator for my lab. In one way it makes it much harder when people can say they like each Hey, I'm looking to get myself a DSO for hobby work, and what I'm looking for is a 2/4ch scope in the 100 MHz-range. Jul 16, 2023 · I would always take Rigol over Hantek considering the specs were even remotely comparable unless the deal was just too good. Aug 3, 2022 · In my country Rigol DS1054Z (50MHz), Hantek DSO4104B (100MHz) and OWON SDS1104 (100MHz) are available and are at the same price. Hello everyone, I'm currently weighing my options between the Rigol DHO804 and the Rigol DHO914S. These two are close to the same price ($250 for the unit and ~$300 for the rigol) Both 2 channel but the rigol is a 200 MHz and the Unit is 100MHz. Hantek have fast waveforms per second speed but it have it ONLY with shortiest memory. I got a used logic pro 16 for $400 I think, way better value than even a Rigol. I would like to ask you if… Looking at the tables for 4 channels when 50 MHz Rigol wins for me. Rigol Wfm = 30,000. Typically Owon risetime is best if compare 100MHz models (Rigol, Hantek and Owon) Owon have best A/D sampling. as it is software-upgradable to the full bandwidth). You can't stop and zoom in on the waveform much when you only have a couple thousand sample points. The software provided for doing screen captures is to put it mildly woeful. Some folks like Siglent, Hantek and Owon. For mainly digital stuff I can recommend a (Saleae-clone) 24 MHz 8 ch logic analyzers for 10-20 bucks . The product overall quality is more important than bandwidth and other technical specifications for me (because I want to start some power electronic circuits design and I need something durable). For the desk based stuff, then a Rigol or Siglent would be my choice if I was in the market for a new scope. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Im debating on which one to buy, the Hantek MSO5074FG or the Rigol DS1074Z or Rigol DS1074Z-S. The comparison table below makes it easier to choose the most fitting oscilloscope. I know that Hantek's DSO5000 series seems to be pretty hackable (200MHz bandwidth, linux based, etc. Rigol, Hantek and Siglent have some low cost solid choices. That alone would be enough to decide between these two. I tried to reset it and update the firmware, but the only thing changed was that the buttons lights are no longer on and don't beep, but still won't start. So Rigol DS1102E, while being a pricier option, tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than the $437 Hantek DSO5202P, as seen on the chart below. luedno The Rigol on the other hand being an actual lab scope is very clear and stable, has a lot of features such as on screen measurements, and comes with software to download screen captures to a PC for printing, storage, or emailing to customers. I saw Hantek 2D72 as well but the HDS272S has better specs for only a little more price. I'm looking at 3 vintage analogue options that are all $100, a Tektronix 475, a Tektronix 2213, and a Tenma 72 720 with a digital analogue trainer. It basically looks like scopes need about 3-4 years on the market for the firmware to be stable enough for me to consider using it. So let’s begin! Design. It's also worth mentioning that the $379 alternative Mar 8, 2023 · Next, we will be taking an in-depth look at the Rigol DS1054Z. Im wondering if thats still a thing or if people have found their way past that? Rigol DS1104Z+ with the RPL1116 Logic Analyser, total £670 Various discussions put the Siglent as better than Rigol for display responsivness / pixel resolution Another option would be completely separate Oscilloscope and Logic Analyser Any suggestions would be most appreciated And even if you one day grow far beyond the capabilities of the Rigol it'll be a great beater scope. I read that it can be unlocked as well with higher bandwidth and software options. I would suggest getting a PicoScope 2000 if you really want a USB scope. 6"), and I I decided to look into rigol and I think I can live without signal generation as I can build a fairly cheap device to make good enough signals for testing with however the models I am looking at are the Rigol ds1054z and the RIgol ds1102z-e the 1054z seems really solid and after all these years has decent stability as well as 4 channels. On top of that, it's fairly safe to say that Rigol DS1054Z is a more popular oscilloscope, based on its reviews. I believe there is a rather long EEVblog thread about it. Unlike the Singlet SDS1104X-E, the Hantek DSO5102P features four math functions, allowing you to analyze data in real-time for quality results. It was the absolute cheapest portable scope I could find at the time. From what I've understood the DS1054Z has been the best entry-level oscillioscope for quite some time now (esp. Hi guys, I read the WIKI on this sub and noticed that the Rigol DS1054Z is the first choice for budget-friendly oscilloscopes. After leaving this page, you can reach your last comparison under "Comparisons". However, it's fairly safe to say that Hantek DSO5102P is a more popular oscilloscope, based on its 100+ reviews. Download file - link to post. Mar 21, 2019 · Re: the eternal question about rigol vs siglent « Reply #17 on: March 21, 2019, 11:58:33 pm » May I give a totally different piece of advice: try to get some time on both and check which one you like the most in terms of interface. Not sure if that makes a huge difference if I’m still a newb. So I’m very tempted to get the Owon HDS272S or HDS2102S. Btw, the rigol is an excellent scope for its price. Do you need a logic analyzer? Jan 3, 2022 · So, I guess the answer is: "it depends". The way I see it, if 20% of the cost covers 90% of my needs, then it's a good buy. Something with similar features from Rigol if you are okay with a few hundred dollars more PlDS1104Z-S Plus. Others have proposed a Rigol model, which I think I'll check out myself. The base model is $119. (also Owon have very low failure rate but not exatly zero but ~1%) Hantek - so much warranty time problems and also so much just DOA units from factory. Personally I'd choose Siglent over either. The side-by-side comparison of the Hantek DSO5102P and Rigol DS1102E oscilloscopes’ specifications. May 7, 2019 · The 2ch variant SDS1202X-E is slightly more expensive than the Rigol DS1054z, however it offers 200MHz BW, 14Mpts memory and all serial decoders included. Not that long ago, Rigol was having a promotion on their site that all software-upgrade features for the DS1000Z series were given out for free if you order directly from their site, which is a huge discount. A 100 MHz scope would be perfect, although I don't know the exact specs I am required to have. The side-by-side comparison of the Hantek DSO4102C and Rigol DS1054Z oscilloscopes’ specifications. These instrumentation companies have been growing their presence in North America and Europe quite rapidly and their scopes are on lab benches everywhere. The Rigol has four channels and a larger screen, but costs 40% more ($260 vs $420) than the Hantek. Look at the "DS1104Z Plus", the big brother of the "DS1054Z" from the same scope family. 🏷️ Rigol Oscilloscopes ⭐⭐⭐ Apr 24, 2021 · I am now going to avoid Hantek like a wildfire. Stay away from chinese crap like Tekway/Hantek, they offer software, but their software is crap. zip. Nov 3, 2024 · On the other hand, the Hantek oscilloscope review, specifically the Hantek DSO5102P, makes this gadget stand out because it features software for PC that offers real-time analysis. Nov 1, 2024 · Realistically, it’s difficult to pick a winner between the Owon SDS1102 VS Hantek DSO5102P debate. Heck, even at the entry level, this still holds if you only look at semi-reputable vendors (e. I legitimately don't understand wanting to do protocol decoding on a scope. I ended up buying a low-end R&S instead and have been super super happy with it. I have the DSO2C15, which is DSO2D15 without the function generator. Rigol DS1054Z « on: October 19, 2016, 02:22:09 pm » I'm having trouble finding enough information to compare the common 200Mhz, 1GSa/s oscilloscopes out there. Having the possibility to analyze digital buses is key in that field. I believe Rigol is still the best of the bunch, just because they've been getting it right for a long time. Hey all! I'm a CE student looking for a reasonably priced digital oscilloscope to use for mostly signal analysis and decoding data transfer protocols at the moment, so some features that I care about are 4 channels, fourier transforms, and I've seen a few that have an arbitrary waveform generator which would be helpful, unless that's the type of thing that I should just get separately. Sep 14, 2019 · Hello After much research I made a decision, I was very interested in micsig to1104 but due to the difficulties to acquire and the risks to give up on this option. which brand (Rigol So Rigol DS1102E tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Hantek DSO5102P, as seen on the chart below. The only reason I bought it was because it claimed to have 8M memory. The older scopes will still be much better than the Hantek if they are in good condition. This is the official community for Genshin Impact (原神), the latest open-world action RPG from HoYoverse. I did look at Rigol. I have a Rigol 1054Z but recently the Rigol DHO800 series was announced/came out (12 bit ADC, USB-C powered, …). The difference between then hantek and the Rigol is tiny by comparison. All the mic options mentioned so far are low-budget options. Jan 3, 2014 · Hantek oscilloscope vs Rigol oscilloscope, whats the better buy? Not open for further replies. So Rigol DS1102E tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Hantek DSO5102P, as seen on the chart below. Also Hantek is not exactly known for high quality construction and bug-free firmware of their scopes. I've got a Hantek USB scope, it's cheap junk, but better than nothing I suppose, though it lacks selectable input coupling. 🏷️ Rigol DS1054Z ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ In this article, we’ll break down the differences, explain what each offers, and help you decide which oscilloscope is the best choice for your needs. The Hantek suggested elsewhere might also be a worthy choice (I've never tried a hantek, so I can't comment). Sep 7, 2019 · Author Topic: Which oscilloscope to choose hantek dso4102c, hantek dso5202p or rigol ds1054z? (Read 13827 times) 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Rigol MSO 5074 logic probes ($750 AUD in my currency) The information I'm struggling to find is the advantages/disadvantages of using the oscilloscope vs an external logic analyser that runs on my computer. Tektronix TDS 360 vs. Observing the datasheets I see that they are products with similar characteristics, the only thing that in my opinion differentiates them is the screen where the hantek is better (7 "vs 5. Also, most of the cheaper scopes only offer one or two triggering modes (the Hantek 6022BL only has edge triggering) while even the cheapest bench scope, e. We have Rigols at work and I know they work fine but the interface doesn't mesh with my brain. does not. However, since you want to explore embedded design, i would suggest one of those MSO instead. Just my thoughts on what would be a good buy. Hello. The scope will absolutely help with aliasing and such (they're pretty powerful time-domain instruments if you use them right), as long as your signal of interest is firmly in the millivolt range. . The comparison table makes it easier to choose between the Rigol DS1054Z and Owon SDS7102 oscilloscopes. Comparisons. Generally speaking, all I seem to be able to find is that Salaea software is better, and the dilligent software is not that great. Rigol is just so much more solid and packed with features and has 4 channels. 5M or 1M selected Owon agen win also in this. The side-by-side comparison of the Rigol DS1054Z and Owon SDS7102 oscilloscopes’ specifications. It was more expensive, but it's a combo 2ch 100MHz scope and 8ch logic analyzer. The Rigol 1054z blows them away, not even close. My laptop will already be on the bench for either looking at reference documents or programming software etc. They seem to have decent reviews for the beginners market. the Rigol DS1054Z has a lot more trigger options. It's also worth mentioning that the $476 alternative A dedicated scope from Rigol is okay too because it will have higher bandwidth and specs, but not as many features for the money such as digital channels or ability to decode serial protocols like I2C or SPI. On top of that, it's fairly safe to say that Rigol DS1104Z is a more popular oscilloscope, based on its reviews. What is also my point - is that Hantek DSO2D15 is far worse than the scope they released I'm kind of the opposite, had a Picoscope and have an oscilloscope (the ubiquitous Rigol DS1054Z). There is no comparison there between the digilent and the rigol. When 2 channels are enough and 100-200 MHz is needed then Siglent. Nov 2, 2024 · Hantek vs Siglent vs Rigol Oscilloscope Alright, so perhaps that’s not the conclusion you wanted to hear, but the truth is that only you would know which oscilloscope works best for your purposes. The only major difference is a wave length which is only 16Kpts for Siglent model vs 2 MPts for Rigol. 24b resolution can potentially get you conversion-step sizes less than a microvolt. Then, we have the Hantek DSO5102P, which is a lot better for beginners. Having actual dedicated knobs for channel gains and settings is approximately 10 6x better than controlling these things with a mouse. It's also worth mentioning that the $499 alternative Comparison of Rigol DS1202CA and Hantek DSO4102C. my choice was for the rigol ds1054z very recommended being better value for money, compared to models that were available in my country it offers me more features than others of the same value, since a long time in the market with Nov 28, 2011 · This is BIG advantage over Hantek and Rigol. These have great features, are compact and portable and cheap. Focusing first on mostly analog stuff but would like to get into some digital stuff later. As with the Rigol, these are dependable entry-level scopes and not toys. Just keep in mind that the old DSOs don't have much sample memory. Not to mention that Rigol actually tells the truth about the sampling rate. If you want something with decent performance, it's much cheaper to get a benchtop scope. In this video you can see FNIRSI 1014D vs OWON SDS1104 vs Hantek DSO2D10 analyzed in 10 different parameters who will be the winner?Find out more about th Adrian's Digital Basement did a review recently on a Hantek 2C42, it's a pretty good/fair overview of the 2xx2 units, compared to my experience so far with the 2D72. One topic only allowS discussion of the bugs in the Rigol DHO800/DHO900 series scopes. So Rigol DS1054Z, while being a cheaper option, tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than the $689 Hantek DSO4254C, as seen on the chart below. I'm interested in getting an oscilloscope to help with building synthesizers. Now if you were building a home lab from scratch and had a tight budget the rigol is one of your better choices. Siglent. Was thinking about Rigol but it seemed like I got less for more money. It's also worth mentioning that the $315 alternative Tinkering with microcontrollers, SPI and IIC and MIDI, as well as analog audio - really not that demanding tasks. Buying oscilloscope: used Rigol ds1054z Vs new or siglent sds1104x-u (EU) I have an option to For me bench space was a factor. They claim these will probably offer me similar results with the main difference being the overal quantity and support of the Owon being maybe a little bit less than Rigol and Siglent. Well, it's neither, but I'll throw it out there anyway. So Rigol DS1054Z tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Hantek DSO5102P, as seen on the chart below. HANTEK 6022BE vs Siglent SDS1022DL vs Rigol DS1052e - tani oscyloskop z FFT. I'm not impressed with the bigger Hanteks I've seen, they reek of cheapness, yet cost $200+. Im on a budget but im willing to spend ONLY if its worth it. Once you know that, you can check out the different brands to see which one has what you need exactly. I only plan to use them once every few months mainly for learning and tinkering with in home repairs. These two look pretty similar. I have a cheap Hantek, Im not impressed. I ordered from Amazon the day before I found out and asked Rigol's customer service if I could get the free upgrades anyway. Buy what you need. Posted by u/TheFedoraKnight - 6 votes and 4 comments So Rigol DS1104Z tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Hantek DSO4204B, as seen on the chart below. However, it's fairly safe to say that Hantek DSO5202P is a more popular oscilloscope, based on its 50+ reviews. I prefer having the separate stand-alone piece of kit which I can just power on when I need it. Becouse it do not use many single slow ADC Dec 7, 2015 · You could consider the Instek GDS 2104A or Instek GDS-2104E as well. I believe I read somewhere that the Autel scope is made by Hantek. 5 mV is an option, which in NDN may be included in the price (I don't remember), there is definitely 24 MS of memory in the promotion. The Rigol DS1054Z features a clean and modern design that is sure to look great on any workbench. You can unlock the Rigol to higher bandwidth and do all kinds of work without tying up the PC screen. The Hantek 6022 has some problems. Oct 1, 2024 · However this has now been replaced with Rigol vs. Total newbie - never used an Oscilloscope except in college. Ultimately I'd like to be able to add features which is why I've been leaning toward the Hantek, although now I'm having some trouble finding a link to a build system (userspace, kernel, etc. The Picoscope always felt like more work for some reason and having the extra screen of the 'scope can be handy if you're cross-checking something on vs Rigol DS1102E Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1202X Hantek DSO4102C vs Hantek DSO5102P Pico PicoScope 2104 vs Hantek 6022BE Siglent SDS1102X I use both the keysight at work and the rigol for a home lab and the keysight is just better. Rigol doesn’t even make a handheld. I'd love a new Rigol or Siglent but they're far too expensive for my budget, however if you guys can find one under $250 that'd be awesome. Plus all the knobs and buttons make the rigol fun to use :). On top of that, it's fairly safe to say that Rigol DS1054Z is a more popular oscilloscope, based on its 100+ reviews. The "DS1104Z Plus" has a logic analyzer connector on the front which provides the ability to add 16 logic analyzer channels after buying the logic analyzer cable, but if you buy the "DS1054Z" there is no way to add the extra logic analyzer channels later. For a begginer in electronics a 50MHz is probably sufficient. For even more from Keysight The Rigol is a 400-500€ scope, the Tektronix is a 3k€ scope. Usually I do stuff on the computer before I use it, and it messes with the flow because it has to take a significant portion of my screen real estate. Rigol made it's entry by building scopes for Agilent/HP over 10 Make sure you get a good (documented!) interface to your computer with the scope, you'll want something like that. PicoScope vs Rigol) As a wild guess, the cost difference originates from the additional development effort it takes to produce and maintain a software suite (and cross-platform drivers) in addition to the firmware. Where you start bumping into their limitations is when you need a spectrum analyzer, reasonably precise and quick FFT and so on. Both Chinese companies, Rigol was founded in 1998 while Siglent was founded four years later. Hantek6022BE. Yes having physical controls is pretty good, but everything about picoscope works really well and feels polished where as rigol. It's also worth mentioning that the $499 alternative Mar 12, 2023 · Over a period of five years I have bought myself three low-end modern digital oscilloscopes, the Rigol DS1054Z, GW-INSTEK GDS1054B and Hantek DSO4084C. If you want a portable scope, Micsig is awesome. If I would have to choose from the last three, I’d go with the Rigols. 1st: Hantek/Owon 3rd: Rigol 4th/"out" unless I get significant new info: Instek Thanks again to all. The comparison table makes it easier to choose between the Hantek DSO4102C and Rigol DS1054Z oscilloscopes. adzfpa xwxj psxukjf rvgcwcoo uhb vdvkm kqih zsoacb wjueq uwomn